3.1 KiB
Osquery: Consider joining against the users table
Proper use of JOIN to return osquery data for users
Many an osquery user has encountered a situation like the following:
$ osqueryi
Using a virtual database. Need help, type '.help'
osquery> SELECT uid, name FROM chrome_extensions LIMIT 3;
+-----+--------------------------------------------+
| uid | name |
+-----+--------------------------------------------+
| 501 | Slides |
| 501 | Docs |
| 501 | 1Password extension (desktop app required) |
+-----+--------------------------------------------+
osquery>
$ sudo osqueryi
Using a virtual database. Need help, type '.help'
osquery> SELECT uid, name FROM chrome_extensions LIMIT 3;
W0519 09:35:27.624747 415233472 virtual_table.cpp:959] The chrome_extensions table returns data based on the current user by default, consider JOINing against the users table
W0519 09:35:27.625207 415233472 virtual_table.cpp:974] Please see the table documentation: https://osquery.io/schema/#chrome_extensions
Our query runs as expected when osqueryi
is run as a normal user, but returns a warning message and no results when run as root via sudo osqueryi
.
This same issue manifests on many tables that include a uid
column:
authorized_keys
chrome_extension_content_scripts
chrome_extensions
crashes
docker_container_processes
firefox_addons
known_hosts
opera_extensions
safari_extensions
shell_history
user_ssh_keys
What’s going on here?
As stated in the error message, these tables return “data based on the current user by default”. When run as a normal user, the implementations know to look in paths relative to the user’s home directories. A query running as root does not know which directories to check.
The solution
Show osquery which users to retrieve the data for. Typically this is achieved by a JOIN
against the users
table to retrieve data for every user on the system:
SELECT uid, name
FROM users CROSS JOIN chrome_extensions USING (uid)
Writing the query with this JOIN
ensures that osquery first generates the list of users, and then provides the user uid
s to the chrome_extensions
table when generating that data.
Note: It is important to use CROSS JOIN
as this tells the query optimizer not to reorder the evaluation of the tables. If we use a regular JOIN
it is possible that reordering could result in the original error being encountered (because the chrome_extensions
table generates with no uid
in its context).