mirror of
https://github.com/valitydev/thrift.git
synced 2024-11-07 18:58:51 +00:00
10522a7f2b
Summary: * no ?INFO for every oop:call ... way too expensive * unfactor symbol/1 ... it was that way for a reason apparently * upped crash report depth to 3 Reviewed By: eletuchy Test Plan: /much/ less CPU eaten by logging Revert Plan: ok git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/thrift/trunk@665343 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
build | ||
include | ||
src | ||
COPYING | ||
LICENSE | ||
Makefile | ||
README | ||
TODO | ||
vsn.mk |
Thrift Erlang Library README Author: Chris Piro (cpiro@facebook.com) Last Modified: 2007-Sep-17 Thrift is distributed under the Thrift open source software license. Please see the included LICENSE file. Using Thrift with Erlang ======================== The Thrift Erlang binding is built using GNU make. Run `make' in lib/erl to generate the necessary .beam object files in lib/erl/ebin/. Although the directories are laid out much like an OTP application, these bindings (as you will soon discover) are not an OTP application proper. When starting the Erlang emulator (interpreter) you must use `-pa /path/to/thrift/lib/erl/ebin' to load the bindings. Running the Tutorial ==================== It is recommended to pattern your own servers after the tutorial included in tutorial/. Generate the gen-erl/ directory by running tutorial.thrift, then cd to tutorial/erl/ and run server.sh. This script includes the commmands necessary to compile the generated Erlang source, compile the tutorial server itself, and open the Erlang emulator. At the emulator prompt, type `server:start()' to begin listening for connections. Note that there is no tutorial client; you may use a supplied client in another language. Implementation Notes ==================== tExecptions and t*Factorys are straight "new" -- e.g. TF = tTransportFactory:new() everything else is start_new (i.e. gen_server:start_link) -- this spawns a process and returns a pid tErlProcessor is a shim around the generated code (which is not actually a gen_server). Of course tErlProcessor isn't a gen_server either ... thrift_oop_server is a shim to make our "Thrift objects" gen_servers. Maybe we should remove some layers? get/set never means process dictionary Use tErlServer and tErlAcceptor. tSimpleServer and tServerSocket as are present in the other bindings are incompatible by design ... the call trace is spastic across the process tree. tErlServer and tErlAcceptor follow the same model as iserve: * the top level code spawns a tErlServer, which listens on a socket * a tErlAcceptor is spawned and calls accept() on the listening socket * when accept() finishes, the tErlAcceptor * tells the tErlServer to spawn a new acceptor * handles the requests by spawning a processor, a transport, and a protocol * (the tricky part) when the socket closes, the protocol exits, so: * the transport exits because it's the one caller of the protocol * likewise, the processor exits because it's the caller of the transport * the tErlAcceptor traps the protocol's exit and exits with an acceptor_done * the tErlServer sees that the acceptor exited and does nothing since there is already another acceptor accept()ing on the listen socket For info about iserve: http://www.trapexit.org/A_fast_web_server_demonstrating_some_undocumented_Erlang_features Final Thoughts ============== This binding is a work in progress. It's certainly less thoroughly tested than the other, older bindings. Despite using parts from otp_base it is not packaged well, nor is it an OTP application (not to mention its many smaller transgressions). This implementation intentionally patterns after the other bindings (which is why there's oop.erl and thrift_oop_server), but regretfully it departs from idiomatic Erlang. Please see the included TODO and contribute your improvements back to the project.