salt/doc/topics/development/labels.rst

319 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _labels-and-milestones:
============================
GitHub Labels and Milestones
============================
SaltStack uses several label categories, as well as milestones, to triage
incoming issues and pull requests in the GitHub issue tracker. Labels are used
to sort issues by type, priority, severity, status, functional area, functional
group, and targeted release and pull requests by status, functional area,
functional group, type of change, and test status. Milestones are used to
indicate whether an issue is fully triaged or is scheduled to be fixed by
SaltStack in an upcoming sprint.
Milestones
==========
All issues are assigned to a milestone, whereas pull requests are almost never
assigned to a milestone as the mean lifetime of pull requests is short enough
that there is no need to track them temporally.
SaltStack uses milestones to indicate which issues are blocked on submitter or
upstream actions, are approved, or are scheduled to be fixed or implemented in
an upcoming sprint. If an issue is not attached to a sprint milestone, you are
welcome to work on it at your own desire and convenience. If it is attached to
a sprint milestone and you have already begun working on it or have a solution
in mind or have other ideas related to the issue, you are encouraged to
coordinate with the assignee via the GitHub issue tracker to create the best
possible solution or implementation.
- ``Approved`` - The issue has been validated and has all necessary information.
- ``Blocked`` - The issue is waiting on actions by parties outside of
SaltStack, such as receiving more information from the submitter or
resolution of an upstream issue. This milestone is usually applied in
conjunction with the labels ``Info Needed``, ``Question``,
``Expected Behavior``, ``Won't Fix For Now``, or ``Upstream Bug``.
Labels
======
Labels are used to sort and describe issues and pull requests. Some labels are
usually reserved for one or the other, though most labels may be applied to
both.
New issues will receive at least one label and a milestone, and new pull
requests will receive at least one label. Except for the :ref:`functional area
<functional-area-labels>` and :ref:`functional group <functional-group-labels>`
label categories, issues will generally receive only up to one label per
category.
Type
----
Issues are categorized into one of several types. Type labels are almost never
used for pull requests. GitHub treats pull requests like issues in many ways,
so a pull request could be considered an issue with an implicit ``Pull
Request`` type label applied.
- ``Feature`` - The issue is a request for new functionality including changes,
enhancements, refactors, etc.
- ``Bug`` - The issue documents broken, incorrect, or confusing behavior. This
label is always accompanied by a :ref:`severity label <bug-severity-labels>`.
- ``Duplicate`` - The issue is a duplicate of another feature request or bug
report.
- ``Upstream Bug`` - The issue is a result of an upstream issue.
- ``Question`` - The issue is more of a question than a request for new
features or a report of broken features, but can sometimes lead to further
discussion or changes of confusing or incongruous behavior or documentation.
- ``Expected Behavior`` - The issue is a bug report of intended functionality.
Priority
--------
An issue's priority is relative to its :ref:`functional area
<functional-area-labels>`. If a bug report, for example, about ``gitfs``
indicates that all users of ``gitfs`` will encounter this bug, then a ``P1``
label will be applied, even though users who are not using ``gitfs`` will not
encounter the bug. If a feature is requested by many users, it may be given a
high priority.
- ``P1`` - The issue will be seen by all users.
- ``P2`` - The issue will be seen by most users.
- ``P3`` - The issue will be seen by about half of users.
- ``P4`` - The issue will not be seen by most users. Usually the issue is a
very specific use case or corner case.
.. _bug-severity-labels:
Severity
--------
Severity labels are almost always only applied to issues labeled ``Bug``.
- ``Blocker`` - The issue is blocking an impending release.
- ``Critical`` - The issue causes data loss, crashes or hangs salt processes,
makes the system unresponsive, etc.
- ``High Severity`` - The issue reports incorrect functionality, bad
functionality, a confusing user experience, etc.
- ``Medium Severity`` - The issue reports cosmetic items, formatting, spelling,
colors, etc.
.. _functional-area-labels:
Functional Area
---------------
Many major components of Salt have corresponding GitHub labels. These labels
are applied to all issues and pull requests as is reasonably appropriate. They
are useful in organizing issues and pull requests according to the source code
relevant to issues or the source code changed by pull requests.
- ``Execution Module``
- ``File Servers``
- ``Grains``
- ``Multi-Master``
- ``Packaging`` Related to packaging of Salt, not Salt's support for package management.
- ``Pillar``
- ``RAET``
- ``Returners``
- ``Runners``
- ``SPM``
- ``Salt-API``
- ``Salt-Cloud``
- ``Salt-SSH``
- ``Salt-Syndic``
- ``State Module``
- ``Tests``
- ``Transport``
- ``Windows``
- ``ZMQ``
.. _functional-group-labels:
Functional Group
----------------
These labels sort issues and pull requests according to the internal SaltStack
engineering teams.
- ``Core`` - The issue or pull request relates to code that is central or
existential to Salt itself.
- ``Platform`` - The issue or pull request relates to support and integration
with various platforms like traditional operating systems as well as
containers, platform-based utilities like filesystems, command schedulers,
etc., and system-based applications like webservers, databases, etc.
- ``RIoT`` - The issue or pull request relates to support and integration with
various abstract systems like cloud providers, hypervisors, API-based
services, etc.
- ``Console`` - The issue or pull request relates to the SaltStack enterprise
console.
- ``Documentation`` - The issue or pull request relates to documentation.
Status
------
Status labels are used to define and track the state of issues and pull
requests. Not all potential statuses correspond to a label, but some statuses
are common enough that labels have been created for them. If an issue has not
been moved beyond the ``Blocked`` milestone, it is very likely that it will
only have a status label.
- ``Bugfix - back-port`` The pull request needs to be back-ported to an older
release branch. This is done by :ref:`recreating the pull request
<backporting-pull-requests>` against that branch. Once the back-port is
completed, this label is replaced with a ``Bugfix - [Done] back-ported``
label. Normally, new features should go into the develop and bug fixes into
the oldest supported release branch, see :ref:`here <which-salt-branch>`.
- ``Bugfix - [Done] back-ported`` - The pull request has been back-ported to an
older branch.
- ``Cannot Reproduce`` - The issue is a bug and has been reviewed by a
SaltStack engineer, but it cannot be replicated with the provided information
and context. Those involved with the bug will need to work through
additional ideas until the bug can be isolated and verified.
- ``Confirmed`` - The issue is a bug and has been confirmed by a SaltStack
engineer, who often documents a minimal working example that reproduces the
bug.
- ``Fixed Pending Verification`` - The issue is a bug and has been fixed by one
or more pull requests, which should link to the issue. Closure of the issue
is contingent upon confirmation of resolution from the submitter. If the
submitter reports a negative confirmation, this label is removed. If no
response is given after a few weeks, then the issue will be assumed fixed and
closed.
- ``Info Needed`` - The issue needs more information before it can be verified
and resolved. For a feature request this may include a description of the
use cases. Almost all bug reports need to include at least the versions of
salt and its dependencies, the system type and version, commands used, debug
logs, error messages, and relevant configs.
- ``Pending Changes`` - The pull request needs additional changes before it can
be merged.
- ``Pending Discussion`` - The issue or pull request needs more discussion
before it can be closed or merged. The status of the issue or pull request
is not clear or apparent enough for definite action to be taken, or
additional input from SaltStack, the submitter, or another party has been
requested.
If the issue is not a pull request, once the discussion has arrived at a
cogent conclusion, this label will be removed and the issue will be accepted.
If it is a pull request, the results of the discussion may require additional
changes and thus, a ``Pending Changes`` label.
- ``Won't Fix for Now`` - The issue is legitimate, but it is not something the
SaltStack team is currently able or willing to fix or implement. Issues
having this label may be revisited in the future.
Type of Change
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Every pull request should receive a change label. These labels measure the
quantity of change as well as the significance of the change. The amount of
change and the importance of the code area changed are considered, but often
the depth of secondary code review required and the potential repercussions of
the change may also advise the label choice.
Core code areas include: state compiler, crypto engine, master and minion and
syndic daemons, transport, pillar rendering, loader, transport layer, event
system, salt.utils, client, cli, logging, netapi, runner engine, templating
engine, top file compilation, file client, file server, mine, salt-ssh, test
runner, etc.
Non-core code usually constitutes the specific set of plugins for each of the
several plugin layers of Salt: execution modules, states, runners, returners,
clouds, etc.
- ``Minor Change``
* Less than 64 lines changed, or
* Less than 8 core lines changed
- ``Medium Change``
* Less than 256 lines changed, or
* Less than 64 core lines changed
- ``Master Change``
* More than 256 lines changed, or
* More than 64 core lines changed
- ``Expert Change``
* Needs specialized, in-depth review
Test Status
-----------
These labels relate to the status of the automated tests that run on pull
requests. If the tests on a pull request fail and are not overridden by one of
these labels, the pull request submitter needs to update the code and/or tests
so that the tests pass and the pull request can be merged.
- ``Lint`` - The pull request has passed all tests except for the code lint
checker.
- ``Tests Passed`` - The pull request has passed all tests even though some
test results are negative. Sometimes the automated testing infrastructure
will encounter internal errors unrelated to the code change in the pull
request that cause test runs to fail. These errors can be caused by cloud
host and network issues and also Jenkins issues like erroneously accumulating
workspace artifacts, resource exhaustion, and bugs that arise from long
running Jenkins processes.
Other
-----
These labels indicate miscellaneous issue types or statuses that are common or
important enough to be tracked and sorted with labels.
- ``Awesome`` - The pull request implements an especially well crafted
solution, or a very difficult but necessary change.
- ``Help Wanted`` - The issue appears to have a simple solution. Issues having
this label should be a good starting place for new contributors to Salt.
- ``Needs Testcase`` - The issue or pull request relates to a feature that
needs test coverage. The pull request containing the tests should reference
the issue or pull request having this label, whereupon the label should be
removed.
- ``Regression`` - The issue is a bug that breaks functionality known to work
in previous releases.
- ``Story`` - The issue is used by a SaltStack engineer to track progress on
multiple related issues in a single place.
- ``Stretch`` - The issue is an optional goal for the current sprint but may
not be delivered.
- ``ZD`` - The issue is related to a Zendesk customer support ticket.
- ``<Release>`` - The issue is scheduled to be implemented by ``<Release>``.
See :ref:`here <version-numbers>` for a discussion of Salt's release
codenames.