mirror of
https://github.com/valitydev/salt.git
synced 2024-11-07 08:58:59 +00:00
2035 lines
79 KiB
Python
2035 lines
79 KiB
Python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||
|
||
# Import Python libs
|
||
from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function, unicode_literals
|
||
import logging
|
||
import os
|
||
import shutil
|
||
import sys
|
||
import tempfile
|
||
import textwrap
|
||
import threading
|
||
import time
|
||
|
||
# Import Salt Testing libs
|
||
from tests.support.case import ModuleCase
|
||
from tests.support.helpers import with_tempdir
|
||
from tests.support.unit import skipIf
|
||
from tests.support.paths import BASE_FILES, TMP, TMP_PILLAR_TREE
|
||
from tests.support.mixins import SaltReturnAssertsMixin
|
||
|
||
# Import Salt libs
|
||
import salt.utils.atomicfile
|
||
import salt.utils.files
|
||
import salt.utils.path
|
||
import salt.utils.platform
|
||
import salt.utils.stringutils
|
||
from salt.modules.virtualenv_mod import KNOWN_BINARY_NAMES
|
||
|
||
# Import 3rd-party libs
|
||
from salt.ext import six
|
||
|
||
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||
|
||
|
||
DEFAULT_ENDING = salt.utils.stringutils.to_bytes(os.linesep)
|
||
|
||
|
||
def trim_line_end(line):
|
||
'''
|
||
Remove CRLF or LF from the end of line.
|
||
'''
|
||
if line[-2:] == salt.utils.stringutils.to_bytes('\r\n'):
|
||
return line[:-2]
|
||
elif line[-1:] == salt.utils.stringutils.to_bytes('\n'):
|
||
return line[:-1]
|
||
raise Exception("Invalid line ending")
|
||
|
||
|
||
def reline(source, dest, force=False, ending=DEFAULT_ENDING):
|
||
'''
|
||
Normalize the line endings of a file.
|
||
'''
|
||
fp, tmp = tempfile.mkstemp()
|
||
os.close(fp)
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(tmp, 'wb') as tmp_fd:
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(source, 'rb') as fd:
|
||
lines = fd.readlines()
|
||
for line in lines:
|
||
line_noend = trim_line_end(line)
|
||
tmp_fd.write(line_noend + ending)
|
||
if os.path.exists(dest) and force:
|
||
os.remove(dest)
|
||
os.rename(tmp, dest)
|
||
|
||
|
||
class StateModuleTest(ModuleCase, SaltReturnAssertsMixin):
|
||
'''
|
||
Validate the state module
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
maxDiff = None
|
||
|
||
@classmethod
|
||
def setUpClass(cls):
|
||
def _reline(path, ending=DEFAULT_ENDING):
|
||
'''
|
||
Normalize the line endings of a file.
|
||
'''
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(path, 'rb') as fhr:
|
||
lines = fhr.read().splitlines()
|
||
with salt.utils.atomicfile.atomic_open(path, 'wb') as fhw:
|
||
for line in lines:
|
||
fhw.write(line + ending)
|
||
|
||
destpath = os.path.join(BASE_FILES, 'testappend', 'firstif')
|
||
_reline(destpath)
|
||
destpath = os.path.join(BASE_FILES, 'testappend', 'secondif')
|
||
_reline(destpath)
|
||
|
||
def test_show_highstate(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
state.show_highstate
|
||
'''
|
||
high = self.run_function('state.show_highstate')
|
||
destpath = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(high, dict))
|
||
self.assertTrue(destpath in high)
|
||
self.assertEqual(high[destpath]['__env__'], 'base')
|
||
|
||
def test_show_lowstate(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
state.show_lowstate
|
||
'''
|
||
low = self.run_function('state.show_lowstate')
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(low, list))
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(low[0], dict))
|
||
|
||
def test_catch_recurse(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
state.show_sls used to catch a recursive ref
|
||
'''
|
||
err = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='recurse_fail')
|
||
self.assertIn('recursive', err[0])
|
||
|
||
def test_no_recurse(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify that a sls structure is NOT a recursive ref
|
||
'''
|
||
sls = self.run_function('state.show_sls', mods='recurse_ok')
|
||
self.assertIn('snmpd', sls)
|
||
|
||
def test_no_recurse_two(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify that a sls structure is NOT a recursive ref
|
||
'''
|
||
sls = self.run_function('state.show_sls', mods='recurse_ok_two')
|
||
self.assertIn('/etc/nagios/nrpe.cfg', sls)
|
||
|
||
def test_running_dictionary_consistency(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Test the structure of the running dictionary so we don't change it
|
||
without deprecating/documenting the change
|
||
'''
|
||
running_dict_fields = [
|
||
'__id__',
|
||
'__run_num__',
|
||
'__sls__',
|
||
'changes',
|
||
'comment',
|
||
'duration',
|
||
'name',
|
||
'result',
|
||
'start_time',
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
sls = self.run_function('state.single',
|
||
fun='test.succeed_with_changes',
|
||
name='gndn')
|
||
|
||
for state, ret in sls.items():
|
||
for field in running_dict_fields:
|
||
self.assertIn(field, ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_running_dictionary_key_sls(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Ensure the __sls__ key is either null or a string
|
||
'''
|
||
sls1 = self.run_function('state.single',
|
||
fun='test.succeed_with_changes',
|
||
name='gndn')
|
||
|
||
sls2 = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='gndn')
|
||
|
||
for state, ret in sls1.items():
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(ret['__sls__'], type(None)))
|
||
|
||
for state, ret in sls2.items():
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(ret['__sls__'], six.string_types))
|
||
|
||
def _remove_request_cache_file(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
remove minion state request file
|
||
'''
|
||
cache_file = os.path.join(self.get_config('minion')['cachedir'], 'req_state.p')
|
||
if os.path.exists(cache_file):
|
||
os.remove(cache_file)
|
||
|
||
def test_request(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify sending a state request to the minion(s)
|
||
'''
|
||
self._remove_request_cache_file()
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested')
|
||
result = ret['cmd_|-count_root_dir_contents_|-ls -a / | wc -l_|-run']['result']
|
||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||
|
||
def test_check_request(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify checking a state request sent to the minion(s)
|
||
'''
|
||
self._remove_request_cache_file()
|
||
|
||
self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.check_request')
|
||
result = ret['default']['test_run']['cmd_|-count_root_dir_contents_|-ls -a / | wc -l_|-run']['result']
|
||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||
|
||
def test_clear_request(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify clearing a state request sent to the minion(s)
|
||
'''
|
||
self._remove_request_cache_file()
|
||
|
||
self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.clear_request')
|
||
self.assertTrue(ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_run_request_succeeded(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify running a state request sent to the minion(s)
|
||
'''
|
||
self._remove_request_cache_file()
|
||
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested_win')
|
||
else:
|
||
self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested')
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.run_request')
|
||
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
key = 'cmd_|-count_root_dir_contents_|-Get-ChildItem C:\\\\ | Measure-Object | %{$_.Count}_|-run'
|
||
else:
|
||
key = 'cmd_|-count_root_dir_contents_|-ls -a / | wc -l_|-run'
|
||
|
||
result = ret[key]['result']
|
||
self.assertTrue(result)
|
||
|
||
def test_run_request_failed_no_request_staged(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify not running a state request sent to the minion(s)
|
||
'''
|
||
self._remove_request_cache_file()
|
||
|
||
self.run_function('state.request', mods='modules.state.requested')
|
||
self.run_function('state.clear_request')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.run_request')
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret, {})
|
||
|
||
@with_tempdir()
|
||
def test_issue_1896_file_append_source(self, base_dir):
|
||
'''
|
||
Verify that we can append a file's contents
|
||
'''
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(base_dir, 'test.append')
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_state('file.touch', name=testfile)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
ret = self.run_state(
|
||
'file.append',
|
||
name=testfile,
|
||
source='salt://testappend/firstif')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
ret = self.run_state(
|
||
'file.append',
|
||
name=testfile,
|
||
source='salt://testappend/secondif')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(testfile, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
testfile_contents = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
|
||
contents = textwrap.dedent('''\
|
||
# set variable identifying the chroot you work in (used in the prompt below)
|
||
if [ -z "$debian_chroot" ] && [ -r /etc/debian_chroot ]; then
|
||
debian_chroot=$(cat /etc/debian_chroot)
|
||
fi
|
||
|
||
# enable bash completion in interactive shells
|
||
if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix; then
|
||
. /etc/bash_completion
|
||
fi
|
||
''')
|
||
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
new_contents = contents.splitlines()
|
||
contents = os.linesep.join(new_contents)
|
||
contents += os.linesep
|
||
|
||
self.assertMultiLineEqual(contents, testfile_contents)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_state(
|
||
'file.append',
|
||
name=testfile,
|
||
source='salt://testappend/secondif')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
ret = self.run_state(
|
||
'file.append',
|
||
name=testfile,
|
||
source='salt://testappend/firstif')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(testfile, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
testfile_contents = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
|
||
self.assertMultiLineEqual(contents, testfile_contents)
|
||
|
||
def test_issue_1876_syntax_error(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
verify that we catch the following syntax error::
|
||
|
||
/tmp/salttest/issue-1876:
|
||
|
||
file:
|
||
- managed
|
||
- source: salt://testfile
|
||
|
||
file.append:
|
||
- text: foo
|
||
|
||
'''
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'issue-1876')
|
||
|
||
sls = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='issue-1876')
|
||
self.assertIn(
|
||
'ID \'{0}\' in SLS \'issue-1876\' contains multiple state '
|
||
'declarations of the same type'.format(testfile),
|
||
sls
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
def test_issue_1879_too_simple_contains_check(self):
|
||
expected = textwrap.dedent('''\
|
||
# set variable identifying the chroot you work in (used in the prompt below)
|
||
if [ -z "$debian_chroot" ] && [ -r /etc/debian_chroot ]; then
|
||
debian_chroot=$(cat /etc/debian_chroot)
|
||
fi
|
||
# enable bash completion in interactive shells
|
||
if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix; then
|
||
. /etc/bash_completion
|
||
fi
|
||
''')
|
||
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
new_contents = expected.splitlines()
|
||
expected = os.linesep.join(new_contents)
|
||
expected += os.linesep
|
||
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'issue-1879')
|
||
# Delete if exiting
|
||
if os.path.isfile(testfile):
|
||
os.unlink(testfile)
|
||
|
||
# Create the file
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='issue-1879', timeout=120)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# The first append
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-1879.step-1', timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# The second append
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-1879.step-2', timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# Does it match?
|
||
try:
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(testfile, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
contents = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
self.assertMultiLineEqual(expected, contents)
|
||
# Make sure we don't re-append existing text
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-1879.step-1', timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-1879.step-2', timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(testfile, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
contents = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
self.assertMultiLineEqual(expected, contents)
|
||
except Exception:
|
||
if os.path.exists(testfile):
|
||
shutil.copy(testfile, testfile + '.bak')
|
||
raise
|
||
finally:
|
||
if os.path.exists(testfile):
|
||
os.unlink(testfile)
|
||
|
||
def test_include(self):
|
||
tempdir = tempfile.mkdtemp(dir=TMP)
|
||
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, tempdir, ignore_errors=True)
|
||
pillar = {}
|
||
for path in ('include-test', 'to-include-test', 'exclude-test'):
|
||
pillar[path] = os.path.join(tempdir, path)
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='include-test', pillar=pillar)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(pillar['include-test']))
|
||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(pillar['to-include-test']))
|
||
self.assertFalse(os.path.isfile(pillar['exclude-test']))
|
||
|
||
def test_exclude(self):
|
||
tempdir = tempfile.mkdtemp(dir=TMP)
|
||
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, tempdir, ignore_errors=True)
|
||
pillar = {}
|
||
for path in ('include-test', 'exclude-test', 'to-include-test'):
|
||
pillar[path] = os.path.join(tempdir, path)
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='exclude-test', pillar=pillar)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(pillar['include-test']))
|
||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(pillar['exclude-test']))
|
||
self.assertFalse(os.path.isfile(pillar['to-include-test']))
|
||
|
||
@skipIf(salt.utils.path.which_bin(KNOWN_BINARY_NAMES) is None, 'virtualenv not installed')
|
||
def test_issue_2068_template_str(self):
|
||
venv_dir = os.path.join(
|
||
TMP, 'issue-2068-template-str'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
try:
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-2068-template-str-no-dot',
|
||
timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
finally:
|
||
if os.path.isdir(venv_dir):
|
||
shutil.rmtree(venv_dir)
|
||
|
||
# Let's load the template from the filesystem. If running this state
|
||
# with state.sls works, so should using state.template_str
|
||
template_path = os.path.join(
|
||
os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(__file__)),
|
||
'files', 'file', 'base', 'issue-2068-template-str-no-dot.sls'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(template_path, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
template = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.template_str', [template], timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# Now using state.template
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.template', [template_path], timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# Now the problematic #2068 including dot's
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls', mods='issue-2068-template-str', timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# Let's load the template from the filesystem. If running this state
|
||
# with state.sls works, so should using state.template_str
|
||
template_path = os.path.join(
|
||
os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(__file__)),
|
||
'files', 'file', 'base', 'issue-2068-template-str.sls'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(template_path, 'r') as fp_:
|
||
template = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(fp_.read())
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.template_str', [template], timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
# Now using state.template
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.template', [template_path], timeout=120
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_template_invalid_items(self):
|
||
TEMPLATE = textwrap.dedent('''\
|
||
{0}:
|
||
- issue-2068-template-str
|
||
|
||
/tmp/test-template-invalid-items:
|
||
file:
|
||
- managed
|
||
- source: salt://testfile
|
||
''')
|
||
for item in ('include', 'exclude', 'extends'):
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.template_str', [TEMPLATE.format(item)]
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(ret, list))
|
||
self.assertNotEqual(ret, [])
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
['The \'{0}\' declaration found on \'<template-str>\' is '
|
||
'invalid when rendering single templates'.format(item)],
|
||
ret
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
def test_pydsl(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Test the basics of the pydsl
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='pydsl-1')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_issues_7905_and_8174_sls_syntax_error(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file with yaml syntax error.
|
||
|
||
Ensure theses errors are detected and presented to the user without
|
||
stack traces.
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='syntax.badlist')
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
'State \'A\' in SLS \'syntax.badlist\' is not formed as a list'
|
||
])
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='syntax.badlist2')
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
'State \'C\' in SLS \'syntax.badlist2\' is not formed as a list'
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_mixed_require_prereq_use(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several requisites.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_simple_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A fifth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A fifth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-echo E fourth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo E fourth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_req_use_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-echo E_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo E" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-F_|-echo F_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo F" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True}
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.mixed_simple')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_simple_result, result)
|
||
|
||
# test Traceback recursion prereq+require #8785
|
||
# TODO: this is actually failing badly
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error2')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(
|
||
# ret,
|
||
# ['A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error2" ID "B" ID "A"']
|
||
#)
|
||
|
||
# test Infinite recursion prereq+require #8785 v2
|
||
# TODO: this is actually failing badly
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error3')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(
|
||
# ret,
|
||
# ['A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error2" ID "B" ID "A"']
|
||
#)
|
||
|
||
# test Infinite recursion prereq+require #8785 v3
|
||
# TODO: this is actually failing badly, and expected result is maybe not a recursion
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error4')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(
|
||
# ret,
|
||
# ['A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.prereq_require_recursion_error2" ID "B" ID "A"']
|
||
#)
|
||
|
||
# undetected infinite loopS prevents this test from running...
|
||
# TODO: this is actually failing badly
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.mixed_complex1')
|
||
#result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
#self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_watch_in(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test watch_in requisite when there is a success
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.watch_in')
|
||
changes = 'test_|-return_changes_|-return_changes_|-succeed_with_changes'
|
||
watch = 'test_|-watch_states_|-watch_states_|-succeed_without_changes'
|
||
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret[changes]['__run_num__'], 0)
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret[watch]['__run_num__'], 2)
|
||
|
||
self.assertEqual('Watch statement fired.', ret[watch]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertEqual('Something pretended to change',
|
||
ret[changes]['changes']['testing']['new'])
|
||
|
||
def test_watch_in_failure(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test watch_in requisite when there is a failure
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.watch_in_failure')
|
||
fail = 'test_|-return_changes_|-return_changes_|-fail_with_changes'
|
||
watch = 'test_|-watch_states_|-watch_states_|-succeed_without_changes'
|
||
|
||
self.assertEqual(False, ret[fail]['result'])
|
||
self.assertEqual('One or more requisite failed: requisites.watch_in_failure.return_changes',
|
||
ret[watch]['comment'])
|
||
|
||
def normalize_ret(self, ret):
|
||
'''
|
||
Normalize the return to the format that we'll use for result checking
|
||
'''
|
||
result = {}
|
||
for item, descr in six.iteritems(ret):
|
||
result[item] = {
|
||
'__run_num__': descr['__run_num__'],
|
||
'comment': descr['comment'],
|
||
'result': descr['result'],
|
||
'changes': descr['changes'] != {} # whether there where any changes
|
||
}
|
||
return result
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_require_ordering_and_errors(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A fifth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A fifth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-echo E fourth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo E fourth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-F_|-echo F_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' require:\n'
|
||
+ ' foobar: A\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-G_|-echo G_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 6,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' require:\n'
|
||
+ ' cmd: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-H_|-echo H_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 7,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' require:\n'
|
||
+ ' cmd: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_error1')
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
"Cannot extend ID 'W' in 'base:requisites.require_error1'. It is not part of the high state.\nThis is likely due to a missing include statement or an incorrectly typed ID.\nEnsure that a state with an ID of 'W' is available\nin environment 'base' and to SLS 'requisites.require_error1'"
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
# issue #8235
|
||
# FIXME: Why is require enforcing list syntax while require_in does not?
|
||
# And why preventing it?
|
||
# Currently this state fails, should return C/B/A
|
||
result = {}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_simple_nolist')
|
||
self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
'The require statement in state \'B\' in SLS '
|
||
+ '\'requisites.require_simple_nolist\' needs to be formed as a list'
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
# commented until a fix is made for issue #8772
|
||
# TODO: this test actually fails
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_error2')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
# 'Cannot extend state foobar for ID A in "base:requisites.require_error2".'
|
||
# + ' It is not part of the high state.'
|
||
#])
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_recursion_error1')
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
ret,
|
||
['A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.require_recursion_error1" ID "B" ID "A"']
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_require_any(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-/bin/false_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "/bin/false" run',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_any')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_require_any_fail(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_any_fail')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertIn('One or more requisite failed',
|
||
result['cmd_|-D_|-echo D_|-run']['comment'])
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_watch_any(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
cmd_true = 'exit'
|
||
cmd_false = 'exit /B 1'
|
||
else:
|
||
cmd_true = 'true'
|
||
cmd_false = 'false'
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-{0}_|-wait'.format(cmd_true): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_true),
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_true): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_true),
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_false): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_false),
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_true): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_true),
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-{0}_|-wait'.format(cmd_true): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 9,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_true),
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-F_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_true): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_true),
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-G_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_false): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 6,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_false),
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-H_|-{0}_|-run'.format(cmd_false): {
|
||
'__run_num__': 7,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "{0}" run'.format(cmd_false),
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.watch_any')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_watch_any_fail(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.watch_any_fail')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertIn('One or more requisite failed',
|
||
result['cmd_|-A_|-true_|-wait']['comment'])
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_onchanges_any(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-another_changing_state_|-echo "Changed!"_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo "Changed!"" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-changing_state_|-echo "Changed!"_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo "Changed!"" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-test_one_changing_states_|-echo "Success!"_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo "Success!"" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-test_two_non_changing_states_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
'comment': 'State was not run because none of the onchanges reqs changed',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'pip_|-another_non_changing_state_|-mock_|-installed': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
'comment': 'Python package mock was already installed\nAll specified packages are already installed',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'pip_|-non_changing_state_|-mock_|-installed': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
'comment': 'Python package mock was already installed\nAll specified packages are already installed',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onchanges_any')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_onfail_any(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-a_|-exit 0_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 0" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-b_|-exit 1_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 1" run',
|
||
'result': False
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-c_|-exit 0_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 0" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-d_|-echo itworked_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo itworked" run',
|
||
'result': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-e_|-exit 0_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 0" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-f_|-exit 0_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 0" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-g_|-exit 0_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 6,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "exit 0" run',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-h_|-echo itworked_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 7,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
'comment': 'State was not run because onfail req did not change',
|
||
'result': True
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_any')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_full_sls(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Teste the sls special command in requisites
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.fullsls_require')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
# issue #8233: traceback on prereq sls
|
||
# TODO: not done
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.fullsls_prereq')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(['sls command can only be used with require requisite'], ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_require_no_state_module(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several require_in and require.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A fifth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A fifth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-echo E fourth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo E fourth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-G_|-echo G_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 5,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' require:\n'
|
||
+ ' id: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-H_|-echo H_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 6,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' require:\n'
|
||
+ ' id: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.require_no_state_module')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_prereq_simple_ordering_and_errors(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several prereq_in and prereq.
|
||
|
||
Ensure that some of them are failing and that the order is right.
|
||
'''
|
||
expected_result_simple = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-I_|-echo I_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' prereq:\n'
|
||
+ ' cmd: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False},
|
||
'cmd_|-J_|-echo J_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' prereq:\n'
|
||
+ ' foobar: A\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_result_simple_no_state_module = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-I_|-echo I_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' prereq:\n'
|
||
+ ' id: Z\n',
|
||
'result': False,
|
||
'changes': False}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_result_simple2 = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-E_|-echo E_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 4,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo E" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_result_simple3 = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True,
|
||
},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C third_|-wait': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': '',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': False,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
expected_result_complex = {
|
||
'cmd_|-A_|-echo A fourth_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 3,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo A fourth" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-B_|-echo B first_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 0,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo B first" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-C_|-echo C second_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 1,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo C second" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
'cmd_|-D_|-echo D third_|-run': {
|
||
'__run_num__': 2,
|
||
'comment': 'Command "echo D third" run',
|
||
'result': True,
|
||
'changes': True},
|
||
}
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_simple')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result_simple, result)
|
||
|
||
# same test, but not using lists in yaml syntax
|
||
# TODO: issue #8235, prereq ignored when not used in list syntax
|
||
# Currently fails badly with :
|
||
# TypeError encountered executing state.sls: string indices must be integers, not str.
|
||
#expected_result_simple.pop('cmd_|-I_|-echo I_|-run')
|
||
#expected_result_simple.pop('cmd_|-J_|-echo J_|-run')
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_simple_nolist')
|
||
#result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
#self.assertEqual(expected_result_simple, result)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_simple2')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result_simple2, result)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_simple3')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result_simple3, result)
|
||
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_error_nolist')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(
|
||
# ret,
|
||
# ['Cannot extend ID Z in "base:requisites.prereq_error_nolist".'
|
||
# + ' It is not part of the high state.']
|
||
#)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_compile_error1')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
ret['cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run']['comment'],
|
||
'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' prereq:\n'
|
||
+ ' foobar: A\n'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_compile_error2')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
ret['cmd_|-B_|-echo B_|-run']['comment'],
|
||
'The following requisites were not found:\n'
|
||
+ ' prereq:\n'
|
||
+ ' foobar: C\n'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_complex')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result_complex, result)
|
||
|
||
# issue #8210 : prereq recursion undetected
|
||
# TODO: this test fails
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_recursion_error')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(
|
||
# ret,
|
||
# ['A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.prereq_recursion_error" ID "B" ID "A"']
|
||
#)
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_simple_no_state_module')
|
||
result = self.normalize_ret(ret)
|
||
self.assertEqual(expected_result_simple_no_state_module, result)
|
||
|
||
def test_infinite_recursion_sls_prereq(self):
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.prereq_sls_infinite_recursion')
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_use(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several use_in and use.
|
||
|
||
'''
|
||
# TODO issue #8235 & #8774 some examples are still commented in the test file
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.use')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
for item, descr in six.iteritems(ret):
|
||
self.assertEqual(descr['comment'], 'onlyif condition is false')
|
||
|
||
# TODO: issue #8802 : use recursions undetected
|
||
# issue is closed as use does not actually inherit requisites
|
||
# if chain-use is added after #8774 resolution theses tests would maybe become useful
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.use_recursion')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
# 'A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.use_recursion"'
|
||
# + ' ID "B" ID "A"'
|
||
#])
|
||
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.use_recursion2')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
# 'A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.use_recursion2"'
|
||
# + ' ID "C" ID "A"'
|
||
#])
|
||
|
||
#ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.use_auto_recursion')
|
||
#self.assertEqual(ret, [
|
||
# 'A recursive requisite was found, SLS "requisites.use_recursion"'
|
||
# + ' ID "A" ID "A"'
|
||
#])
|
||
|
||
def test_requisites_use_no_state_module(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Call sls file containing several use_in and use.
|
||
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.use_no_state_module')
|
||
self.assertReturnNonEmptySaltType(ret)
|
||
for item, descr in six.iteritems(ret):
|
||
self.assertEqual(descr['comment'], 'onlyif condition is false')
|
||
|
||
def test_get_file_from_env_in_top_match(self):
|
||
tgt = os.path.join(TMP, 'prod-cheese-file')
|
||
try:
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.highstate', minion_tgt='sub_minion'
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSaltTrueReturn(ret)
|
||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(tgt))
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(tgt, 'r') as cheese:
|
||
data = salt.utils.stringutils.to_unicode(cheese.read())
|
||
self.assertIn('Gromit', data)
|
||
self.assertIn('Comte', data)
|
||
finally:
|
||
if os.path.islink(tgt):
|
||
os.unlink(tgt)
|
||
|
||
# onchanges tests
|
||
|
||
def test_onchanges_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onchanges requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onchanges_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when changes are expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_changing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when changes are not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_changing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because none of the onchanges reqs changed'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onchanges_requisite_multiple(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onchanges requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls',
|
||
mods='requisites.onchanges_multiple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when two changes are expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_two_changing_states_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when two changes are not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_two_non_changing_states_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because none of the onchanges reqs changed'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Finally, test the result of the state run when only one of the onchanges requisites changes.
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_one_changing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onchanges_in_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onchanges_in requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onchanges_in_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run of when changes are expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_changes_expected_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when changes are not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_changes_not_expected_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because none of the onchanges reqs changed'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onchanges_requisite_no_state_module(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onchanges requisite without state modules
|
||
'''
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onchanges_simple_no_state_module')
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_changing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onchanges_requisite_with_duration(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onchanges requisite
|
||
the state will not run but results will include duration
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onchanges_simple')
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when changes are not expected to happen
|
||
# and ensure duration is included in the results
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_changing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']
|
||
self.assertIn('duration', test_data)
|
||
|
||
# onfail tests
|
||
|
||
def test_onfail_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onfail requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a failure is expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_failing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a failure is not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_failing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because onfail req did not change'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_multiple_onfail_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test to ensure state is run even if only one
|
||
of the onfails fails. This is a test for the issue:
|
||
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/22370
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_multiple')
|
||
|
||
retcode = state_run['cmd_|-c_|-echo itworked_|-run']['changes']['retcode']
|
||
self.assertEqual(retcode, 0)
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-c_|-echo itworked_|-run']['changes']['stdout']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, 'itworked')
|
||
|
||
def test_onfail_in_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onfail_in requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_in_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a failure is expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_failing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a failure is not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_failing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because onfail req did not change'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onfail_requisite_no_state_module(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onfail requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_simple_no_state_module')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a failure is expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_failing_state_|-echo "Success!"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'Command "echo "Success!"" run'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a failure is not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_failing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']['comment']
|
||
expected_result = 'State was not run because onfail req did not change'
|
||
self.assertIn(expected_result, test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_onfail_requisite_with_duration(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the onfail requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_simple')
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a failure is not expected to happen
|
||
test_data = state_run['cmd_|-test_non_failing_state_|-echo "Should not run"_|-run']
|
||
self.assertIn('duration', test_data)
|
||
|
||
def test_multiple_onfail_requisite_with_required(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test to ensure multiple states are run
|
||
when specified as onfails for a single state.
|
||
This is a test for the issue:
|
||
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/46552
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_multiple_required')
|
||
|
||
retcode = state_run['cmd_|-b_|-echo b_|-run']['changes']['retcode']
|
||
self.assertEqual(retcode, 0)
|
||
|
||
retcode = state_run['cmd_|-c_|-echo c_|-run']['changes']['retcode']
|
||
self.assertEqual(retcode, 0)
|
||
|
||
retcode = state_run['cmd_|-d_|-echo d_|-run']['changes']['retcode']
|
||
self.assertEqual(retcode, 0)
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-b_|-echo b_|-run']['changes']['stdout']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, 'b')
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-c_|-echo c_|-run']['changes']['stdout']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, 'c')
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-d_|-echo d_|-run']['changes']['stdout']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, 'd')
|
||
|
||
def test_multiple_onfail_requisite_with_required_no_run(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test to ensure multiple states are not run
|
||
when specified as onfails for a single state
|
||
which fails.
|
||
This is a test for the issue:
|
||
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/46552
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.onfail_multiple_required_no_run')
|
||
|
||
expected = 'State was not run because onfail req did not change'
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-b_|-echo b_|-run']['comment']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, expected)
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-c_|-echo c_|-run']['comment']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, expected)
|
||
|
||
stdout = state_run['cmd_|-d_|-echo d_|-run']['comment']
|
||
self.assertEqual(stdout, expected)
|
||
|
||
# listen tests
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the listen requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a listener is expected to trigger
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_change_state_|-echo "Listening State"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a listener should not trigger
|
||
absent_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_non_changing_state_|-echo "Only run once"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertNotIn(absent_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_in_requisite(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the listen_in requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_in_simple')
|
||
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a listener is expected to trigger
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_change_state_|-echo "Listening State"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a listener should not trigger
|
||
absent_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_non_changing_state_|-echo "Only run once"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertNotIn(absent_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_in_requisite_resolution(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Verify listen_in requisite lookups use ID declaration to check for changes
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_in_simple')
|
||
|
||
# Test the result of the state run when a listener is expected to trigger
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listen_in_resolution_|-echo "Successful listen_in resolution"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_requisite_resolution(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Verify listen requisite lookups use ID declaration to check for changes
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_simple')
|
||
|
||
# Both listeners are expected to trigger
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_resolution_one_|-echo "Successful listen resolution"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_resolution_two_|-echo "Successful listen resolution"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_requisite_no_state_module(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Tests a simple state using the listen requisite
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_simple_no_state_module')
|
||
# First, test the result of the state run when a listener is expected to trigger
|
||
listener_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_change_state_|-echo "Listening State"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertIn(listener_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
# Then, test the result of the state run when a listener should not trigger
|
||
absent_state = 'cmd_|-listener_test_listening_non_changing_state_|-echo "Only run once"_|-mod_watch'
|
||
self.assertNotIn(absent_state, state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_in_requisite_resolution_names(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Verify listen_in requisite lookups use ID declaration to check for changes
|
||
and resolves magic names state variable
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_in_names')
|
||
self.assertIn('test_|-listener_service_|-nginx_|-mod_watch', state_run)
|
||
self.assertIn('test_|-listener_service_|-crond_|-mod_watch', state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_listen_requisite_resolution_names(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
Verify listen requisite lookups use ID declaration to check for changes
|
||
and resolves magic names state variable
|
||
'''
|
||
|
||
# Only run the state once and keep the return data
|
||
state_run = self.run_function('state.sls', mods='requisites.listen_names')
|
||
self.assertIn('test_|-listener_service_|-nginx_|-mod_watch', state_run)
|
||
self.assertIn('test_|-listener_service_|-crond_|-mod_watch', state_run)
|
||
|
||
def test_issue_30820_requisite_in_match_by_name(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
This tests the case where a requisite_in matches by name instead of ID
|
||
|
||
See https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/30820 for more info
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='requisites.requisite_in_match_by_name'
|
||
)
|
||
bar_state = 'cmd_|-bar state_|-echo bar_|-wait'
|
||
|
||
self.assertIn(bar_state, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[bar_state]['comment'],
|
||
'Command "echo bar" run')
|
||
|
||
def test_retry_option_defaults(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test the retry option on a simple state with defaults
|
||
ensure comment is as expected
|
||
ensure state duration is greater than default retry_interval (30 seconds)
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='retry.retry_defaults'
|
||
)
|
||
retry_state = 'file_|-file_test_|-/path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt_|-exists'
|
||
expected_comment = ('Attempt 1: Returned a result of "False", with the following '
|
||
'comment: "Specified path /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist"\n'
|
||
'Specified path /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist')
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[retry_state]['comment'], expected_comment)
|
||
self.assertTrue(state_run[retry_state]['duration'] > 30)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[retry_state]['result'], False)
|
||
|
||
def test_retry_option_custom(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test the retry option on a simple state with custom retry values
|
||
ensure comment is as expected
|
||
ensure state duration is greater than custom defined interval * (retries - 1)
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='retry.retry_custom'
|
||
)
|
||
retry_state = 'file_|-file_test_|-/path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt_|-exists'
|
||
expected_comment = ('Attempt 1: Returned a result of "False", with the following '
|
||
'comment: "Specified path /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist"\n'
|
||
'Attempt 2: Returned a result of "False", with the following comment: "Specified'
|
||
' path /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist"\nAttempt 3: Returned'
|
||
' a result of "False", with the following comment: "Specified path'
|
||
' /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist"\nAttempt 4: Returned a'
|
||
' result of "False", with the following comment: "Specified path'
|
||
' /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist"\nSpecified path'
|
||
' /path/to/a/non-existent/file.txt does not exist')
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[retry_state]['comment'], expected_comment)
|
||
self.assertTrue(state_run[retry_state]['duration'] > 40)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[retry_state]['result'], False)
|
||
|
||
def test_retry_option_success(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test a state with the retry option that should return True immedietly (i.e. no retries)
|
||
'''
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'retry_file')
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='retry.retry_success'
|
||
)
|
||
os.unlink(testfile)
|
||
retry_state = 'file_|-file_test_|-{0}_|-exists'.format(testfile)
|
||
self.assertNotIn('Attempt', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
|
||
def run_create(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
helper function to wait 30 seconds and then create the temp retry file
|
||
'''
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'retry_file')
|
||
time.sleep(30)
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(testfile, 'a'):
|
||
pass
|
||
|
||
def test_retry_option_eventual_success(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test a state with the retry option that should return True after at least 4 retry attmempt
|
||
but never run 15 attempts
|
||
'''
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'retry_file')
|
||
create_thread = threading.Thread(target=self.run_create)
|
||
create_thread.start()
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='retry.retry_success2'
|
||
)
|
||
retry_state = 'file_|-file_test_|-{0}_|-exists'.format(testfile)
|
||
self.assertIn('Attempt 1:', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertIn('Attempt 2:', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertIn('Attempt 3:', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertIn('Attempt 4:', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertNotIn('Attempt 15:', state_run[retry_state]['comment'])
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[retry_state]['result'], True)
|
||
|
||
def test_issue_38683_require_order_failhard_combination(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
This tests the case where require, order, and failhard are all used together in a state definition.
|
||
|
||
Previously, the order option, which used in tandem with require and failhard, would cause the state
|
||
compiler to stacktrace. This exposed a logic error in the ``check_failhard`` function of the state
|
||
compiler. With the logic error resolved, this test should now pass.
|
||
|
||
See https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/38683 for more information.
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='requisites.require_order_failhard_combo'
|
||
)
|
||
state_id = 'test_|-b_|-b_|-fail_with_changes'
|
||
|
||
self.assertIn(state_id, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[state_id]['comment'], 'Failure!')
|
||
self.assertFalse(state_run[state_id]['result'])
|
||
|
||
def test_issue_46762_prereqs_on_a_state_with_unfulfilled_requirements(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
This tests the case where state C requires state A, which fails.
|
||
State C is a pre-required state for State B.
|
||
Since state A fails, state C will not run because the requisite failed,
|
||
therefore state B will not run because state C failed to run.
|
||
|
||
See https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/46762 for
|
||
more information.
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='issue-46762'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
state_id = 'test_|-a_|-a_|-fail_without_changes'
|
||
self.assertIn(state_id, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[state_id]['comment'],
|
||
'Failure!')
|
||
self.assertFalse(state_run[state_id]['result'])
|
||
|
||
state_id = 'test_|-b_|-b_|-nop'
|
||
self.assertIn(state_id, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[state_id]['comment'],
|
||
'One or more requisite failed: issue-46762.c')
|
||
self.assertFalse(state_run[state_id]['result'])
|
||
|
||
state_id = 'test_|-c_|-c_|-nop'
|
||
self.assertIn(state_id, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[state_id]['comment'],
|
||
'One or more requisite failed: issue-46762.a')
|
||
self.assertFalse(state_run[state_id]['result'])
|
||
|
||
def test_state_nonbase_environment(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls with saltenv using a nonbase environment
|
||
with a salt source
|
||
'''
|
||
filename = os.path.join(TMP, 'nonbase_env')
|
||
try:
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='non-base-env',
|
||
saltenv='prod'
|
||
)
|
||
ret = ret[next(iter(ret))]
|
||
assert ret['result']
|
||
assert ret['comment'] == 'File {0} updated'.format(filename)
|
||
assert os.path.isfile(filename)
|
||
finally:
|
||
try:
|
||
os.remove(filename)
|
||
except OSError:
|
||
pass
|
||
|
||
@skipIf(sys.platform.startswith('win'), 'Skipped until parallel states can be fixed on Windows')
|
||
def test_parallel_state_with_long_tag(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
This tests the case where the state being executed has a long ID dec or
|
||
name and states are being run in parallel. The filenames used for the
|
||
parallel state cache were previously based on the tag for each chunk,
|
||
and longer ID decs or name params can cause the cache file to be longer
|
||
than the operating system's max file name length. To counter this we
|
||
instead generate a SHA1 hash of the chunk's tag to use as the cache
|
||
filename. This test will ensure that long tags don't cause caching
|
||
failures.
|
||
|
||
See https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/49738 for more info.
|
||
'''
|
||
short_command = 'helloworld'
|
||
long_command = short_command * 25
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='issue-49738',
|
||
pillar={'short_command': short_command,
|
||
'long_command': long_command}
|
||
)
|
||
comments = sorted([x['comment'] for x in six.itervalues(ret)])
|
||
expected = sorted(['Command "{0}" run'.format(x)
|
||
for x in (short_command, long_command)])
|
||
assert comments == expected, '{0} != {1}'.format(comments, expected)
|
||
|
||
def _add_runtime_pillar(self, pillar):
|
||
'''
|
||
helper class to add pillar data at runtime
|
||
'''
|
||
import salt.utils.yaml
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(os.path.join(TMP_PILLAR_TREE,
|
||
'pillar.sls'), 'w') as fp:
|
||
salt.utils.yaml.safe_dump(pillar, fp)
|
||
|
||
with salt.utils.files.fopen(os.path.join(TMP_PILLAR_TREE, 'top.sls'), 'w') as fp:
|
||
fp.write(textwrap.dedent('''\
|
||
base:
|
||
'*':
|
||
- pillar
|
||
'''))
|
||
|
||
self.run_function('saltutil.refresh_pillar')
|
||
self.run_function('test.sleep', [5])
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_id_test(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls_id when test is set
|
||
to true in pillar data
|
||
'''
|
||
self._add_runtime_pillar(pillar={'test': True})
|
||
testfile = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
comment = 'The file {0} is set to be changed'.format(testfile)
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'])
|
||
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['comment'], comment)
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes'], {})
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_id_test_state_test_post_run(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls_id when test is set to
|
||
true post the state already being run previously
|
||
'''
|
||
file_name = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'])
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['comment'],
|
||
'File {0} updated'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes']['diff'], 'New file')
|
||
|
||
self._add_runtime_pillar(pillar={'test': True})
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'])
|
||
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
val['comment'],
|
||
'The file {0} is in the correct state'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes'], {})
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_id_test_true(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls_id when test=True is passed as arg
|
||
'''
|
||
file_name = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'], test=True)
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
val['comment'],
|
||
'The file {0} is set to be changed'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes'], {})
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_id_test_true_post_run(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls_id when test is set to true as an
|
||
arg post the state already being run previously
|
||
'''
|
||
file_name = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'])
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['comment'],
|
||
'File {0} updated'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes']['diff'], 'New file')
|
||
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'], test=True)
|
||
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(
|
||
val['comment'],
|
||
'The file {0} is in the correct state'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes'], {})
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_id_test_false_pillar_true(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls_id when test is set to false as an
|
||
arg and minion_state_test is set to True. Should
|
||
return test=False.
|
||
'''
|
||
file_name = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
self._add_runtime_pillar(pillar={'test': True})
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['core'], test=False)
|
||
|
||
for key, val in ret.items():
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['comment'],
|
||
'File {0} updated'.format(file_name))
|
||
self.assertEqual(val['changes']['diff'], 'New file')
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_unicode_characters(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test state.sls when state file contains non-ascii characters
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['issue-46672'])
|
||
log.debug('== ret %s ==', type(ret))
|
||
|
||
_expected = "cmd_|-echo1_|-echo 'This is Æ test!'_|-run"
|
||
self.assertIn(_expected, ret)
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_unicode_characters_cmd_output(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
test the output from running and echo command with non-ascii
|
||
characters.
|
||
'''
|
||
ret = self.run_function('state.sls', ['issue-46672-a'])
|
||
key = list(ret.keys())[0]
|
||
log.debug('== ret %s ==', type(ret))
|
||
_expected = 'This is Æ test!'
|
||
if salt.utils.platform.is_windows():
|
||
# Windows cmd.exe will mangle the output using cmd's codepage.
|
||
if six.PY2:
|
||
_expected = "'This is A+ test!'"
|
||
else:
|
||
_expected = "'This is ’ test!'"
|
||
self.assertEqual(_expected, ret[key]['changes']['stdout'])
|
||
|
||
def tearDown(self):
|
||
nonbase_file = os.path.join(TMP, 'nonbase_env')
|
||
if os.path.isfile(nonbase_file):
|
||
os.remove(nonbase_file)
|
||
|
||
# remove old pillar data
|
||
for filename in os.listdir(TMP_PILLAR_TREE):
|
||
os.remove(os.path.join(TMP_PILLAR_TREE, filename))
|
||
self.run_function('saltutil.refresh_pillar')
|
||
self.run_function('test.sleep', [5])
|
||
|
||
# remove testfile added in core.sls state file
|
||
state_file = os.path.join(TMP, 'testfile')
|
||
if os.path.isfile(state_file):
|
||
os.remove(state_file)
|
||
|
||
def test_state_sls_integer_name(self):
|
||
'''
|
||
This tests the case where the state file is named
|
||
only with integers
|
||
'''
|
||
state_run = self.run_function(
|
||
'state.sls',
|
||
mods='12345'
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
state_id = 'test_|-always-passes_|-always-passes_|-succeed_without_changes'
|
||
self.assertIn(state_id, state_run)
|
||
self.assertEqual(state_run[state_id]['comment'],
|
||
'Success!')
|
||
self.assertTrue(state_run[state_id]['result'])
|