mirror of
https://github.com/empayre/fleet.git
synced 2024-11-06 17:05:18 +00:00
fc3304c902
#15557 Following the precedent that Lucas used for other similar PRs, the best way to review is probably by commits. * The first one simply copies over the files from the fork to the monorepo * Second one adjusts all import paths * Third one tidies up the `go.mod` files * Last one fixes the linter issues in the nanomdm package # Checklist for submitter - ~~Changes file added for user-visible changes in `changes/` or `orbit/changes/`.~~ (not a user-visible change) - [x] Manual QA for all new/changed functionality (ran test suite, re-generated mocks) I also verified that our Go test suite did run the newly moved `nanomdm` package steps: ``` ok github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/server/mdm/nanomdm/cryptoutil 0.003s coverage: 0.0% of statements in github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/... ok github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/server/mdm/nanomdm/mdm 0.005s coverage: 46.2% of statements in github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/... ok github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/server/mdm/nanomdm/service/certauth 1.320s coverage: 20.7% of statements in github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/... ok github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/server/mdm/nanomdm/storage/file 0.007s coverage: 24.1% of statements in github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4/... ``` |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
authz | ||
bindata | ||
config | ||
contexts | ||
datastore | ||
errorstore | ||
fleet | ||
goose | ||
health | ||
launcher | ||
live_query | ||
logging | ||
mdm | ||
mock | ||
policies | ||
ptr | ||
pubsub | ||
service | ||
sso | ||
test | ||
version | ||
vulnerabilities | ||
webhooks | ||
websocket | ||
worker | ||
utils_test.go | ||
utils.go |